You've heard me talk about how photography has never been "one thing." That is, it has always been multiple competing technologies and methods, each with unique inherent properties.
Ten years ago, if you had been taking this class, one of the biggest challenges you would have had to face was failure. When photography was predominantly a film and chemistry undertaking, technical failures were the norm. Exposure was conceptually and technically difficult. Quality of prints was always a challenge. Answers to questions and solutions to problems were elusive and required persistence. It could've been four weeks into class before you had a reasonably decent print that we could then discuss. From an educational standpoint, I often felt like a big part of teaching photography required me to help people learn how to deal with failure and self-doubt. Persistence in the face of difficulty was a pre-requisite for success.
Today, it's different. With the advent of digital imaging, most of the conceptual and technical barriers that existed between you and a technically sufficient picture have been removed. Making a picture that's sharp and reasonably well exposed is easier than ever. All of those "photographic elements" (framing, composition, focus, timing, light...) that we've worked on all semester endure and still require time and attention, but the once-central lessons that came from technical failures are far less frequent.
From my observation, we've moved away from having to deal with technical obstacles to spending more time talking about how photographs work, and how to see the world in ways that yield new insights and revelations. In short, we talk a lot more about perception. How do you see (and show others) the world with fresh eyes? It's hard to do, but worthy of attention.
I don't mean to say that failure and perception are exclusive to the different methods of photography, but I do think that the scales of emphasis have tipped from one to another. I suppose one thing that has remained consistent is that persistence in the face of a challenge is still a pre-requisite for success.
Billy sent me the video (above) about a snowboarder turned wet-plate tintype photographer. Tintypes, if you recall, are a wet-plate process that produce a one-of-a-kind image, somewhat akin to daguerreotypes. Tintypes were often referred to as the "poor man's daguerreotype". This guy has a passion that is consistent with people who become consumed with a creative enterprise. He converted a large van into a mobile camera obscura and has dedicated his life to making mammoth tintypes.
What's most interesting to me in the video is how, despite his pure devotion to his enterprise, he still has to struggle with the failure of his medium. It just points out to me of how the lessons of photography have changed along with the medium.
Thanks Billy!
Byron